Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
Subjects who answered "yes" to the screening question were considered to have CMSCs.
Responses to the first question were considered correct if the answer was "touching" or "grasping" in response to the appropriate picture.
Answers to the second question were considered correct if children reported the intention typically related to the use of the object (e.g. "to brush" for a brush, "to phone" for a telephone) in response to "use" pictures, or answered "placing" in response to "place" pictures.
Those who answered 'yes' to the first question were considered eligible to participate in this study.
Participants answering "yes" to this question were considered to have engaged in sex work.
Litters above mean size of the parity group in question were considered large.
Similar(41)
"No question is considered stupid," she says.
The question is considered ludicrous by many scholars.
The guests all have something to plug, and no question is considered too anodyne or banal.
Nothing involving a federal question was considered or decided by the court.
A cylinder with a geometry that displayed the particular buckling pattern in question was considered for this study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com