In 2006, Cass R. Sunstein, now a law professor at Harvard, considered the question in the context of affirmative action.
The Supreme Court has accepted divided guilty verdicts in some circumstances, but it has never considered the question in the context of a capital case.
Inspired by the tsunami of caped crusader movies currently washing through Hollywood, Melbourne-based writer-director Robert Mond poses a similar question in the context of superheroes.
Two years ago, in Wyeth v. Levine, the court decided the same question in the context of brand-name drugs but came to the opposite conclusion.
In earlier cases, the court ruled on the question in the context of annual fees, authorizing methods under which nonmembers could opt out of such payments.
It's not just shorter, it conveys the sense of what is happening much better — and it places the idea in question in the context of other zombie ideas.
Deducing the existence of private rights to sue, a complex area of law in any event, is an even more elusive question in the context in which it reached the Supreme Court in this case.
And Trump emphasized to Holt — and to anyone watching who might want a position in his Administration — that he had asked Comey the question in the context of an exchange in which Comey asked to keep his job.
Courts in other states have allowed lawsuits for the negligent transmission of sexual diseases based on both actual and constructive knowledge, but they have only rarely confronted the question in the context of H.I.V.
Why? Room for Debate asked this same question in the context of the bombings at the Boston Marathon last week: When the bombs went off at the Boston Marathon, the crowd scattered.
A follow-up question, in the context of a host of business leaders publicly warning of the economic consequences of the UK losing its place at the EU top table, pressed whether EU membership was a price worth paying if it benefited the economy.
