Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
This is a serious question, in terms of both policy and profit.
For a long time, they couched the question in terms of social responsibility.
Even framing the question in terms of owner occupation is part of the problem.
I don't even ask the question in terms of just business.
What I try to teach people is, don't ask the first question in terms of numbers.
(Other surveys that frame the question in terms of giving minorities "preference" find less support).
In The Natural Resources Trap, top scholars address this question in terms of both theory and practice.
Instead, I ask his friends and supporters an obvious question: in terms of fundamental issues, why are they here?
Without being disrespectful, Your Honor, I think you've answered the question in terms of phrasing the question.
We prove a Delorme Guichardet type theorem for discrete quantum groups expressing property (T) of the quantum group in question in terms of its first cohomology groups.
The Court phrases the question in terms of whether a 'right of action' exists, saying that no question of 'standing' or 'jurisdiction' is presented.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com