Sentence examples for question groups from inspiring English sources

Further, multiple Likert scales had been used for different question groups (Edzie 2014).

False-belief test question: Groups differed significantly: Kruskall Wallis χ(3) = 11.72, df = 3, P = 0.008).

The inter-group correlation of 0.6 suggests an adequate degree of correlation among the differing question groups.

False-belief test question: Groups differed significantly on the non-parametric Kruskall Wallis test: χ(3) = 14.664, df = 3, P < 0.002.

These three factors were all of the instrumental motivation factors listed in this question grouping.

Table 8 further presents the correlations between the items in this question grouping.

The mean responses of student groups are graphed for each question group and reported in tabular form alongside standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals.

The correcting significance levels for type I error using a Bonferroni correction (Myers and Well 1995) are also discussed for each question grouping.

As this question grouping is a subset of the MSLQ looking at students' performance motivation self-efficacy, high Cronbach's α results and widespread correlations are not surprising.

Because each question group was focused on a different topic (reasons for choice, self-efficacy, etc)., it was expected that inter-item reliability across a larger group of questions and most inter-item correlations would be low.

To investigate this question, group studies are necessary.