Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
There were no statistically significant differences in responses to any question between the two groups.
This should be rather straightforward and would confirm the two versus one binding site question between the two LapG homologs.
Excluding non-responders, kappa assessing the reliability of parental responses to this question between the two sweeps was high (κ=0.97).
Excluding non-responders, kappa assessing the reliability of parental responses to this question between the two sweeps was high (kappa = 0.97).
Based upon the simplifying assumptions that mutations occur randomly, that non-synonymous changes do not occur in conserved regions, and that the fixation of synonymous mutations follows a Poisson distribution, the proportion of primer binding regions that will have three or more mismatches can be calculated based upon the rate of evolution for the gene in question between the two index species.
Similar(55)
In experiments 2 and 3 there were no significant differences in participant reports, (p's>.05) in the control questions between the two touch conditions so the data were excluded from further analysis.
Differences in the acceptance of questions between the two analysis populations were arbitrated by the investigative team to derive the EIA detection tool.
Despite performing 29 tests, there were no significant differences in the mean scores for any of the 29 questions between the two administrations.
(Table 2) Post-video knowledge scores also did not differ significantly (2.1 vs. 2.0, t-test p = 0.75; 36% vs. 32% responding correctly to all questions) between the two groups.
Only one item was significant (P = 0.03) with the Bowker's S test: No agreement was observed for 'Feeling tired or having little energy' from the question 25 (PHQ9) between the two measures.
Differences in educational qualifications persisted after weighting and were probably due to differences in question format between the two surveys.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com