The value of robustness is a negative quantity by definition [ 8, 28], but for plotting purpose we have shown the absolute value of robustness coefficient (Taking the absolute value doesn't affect the relative robustness in different models and the values closest to zero implies maximum robustness).
For vector quantities the definition must apply to all components of the vector.
These commutators define the algebra of the SE ( 2 ) group (see, e.g., [9] and references therein), and for them the following generalized uncertainty principle holds [13, 21], with respect to the quantities of Definition 3.1.
We found 13.7% more patients were identified as recipients of 'potentially inappropriate polypharmacy' when the quantity-specific definition was used, 'six or more concurrent medications.' When a drug-specific definition was applied, we found that 15.7% were recipients of 'potentially inappropriate polypharmacy.' These disparate results call the validity and reliability into question.
A quantity-specific definition of polypharmacy, however, is easy to construct and apply, but this method is associated with a relatively high rate of false positives, not specific for 'inappropriate medication use.' The vague and often dissimilar use of the term 'polypharmacy' within the literature supports the discontinuation of its use.
Second terms, when the central figure is a familiar and known quantity, are by definition short on novelty.
Nevertheless, we do agree with the fundamental idea of [ 17]: the best way to build a common statistical standard is to start with a statistical quantity whose precise definition is independent of the details of the various search algorithms.
We will also study and simplify some quantities in the definition of the super-pseudoconvex domain in ({mathbb {C}}^n).
(2.2) yield the same quantities as the definition above using the Yoneda embedding h _.
Because his body also transcends the definition of quantity, the problem of limited quantity is removed as well.
