Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Even for the extremely discordant twins, no genome-wide statistical significance was found for qualitative or quantitative discordance.
Again, no site showed genome-wide statistical significance for qualitative or quantitative discordance.
Figure 2a is the Manhattan plot for EWAS on qualitative discordance and Figure 2b for quantitative discordance.
Figure 3 displays the Manhattan plots for the p values from EWAS on qualitative and quantitative discordance.
This means that our model includes parameters standing for the effects of both qualitative and quantitative discordance while adjusting for important covariates (age, sex) and for random effects.
Our association analysis revealed no CpG site with genome-wide statistical significance (FDR < 0.05) for either qualitative (larger or smaller) or quantitative discordance in birth weight.
Similar(52)
Fig. 3 Discordance quantitative diagnoses.
This overlap is not restricted to the quantitative MoCA: similar discordance was found between diagnostic categories and cognition as indexed by the NPZ-8.
Results from our EWAS revealed no CpG sites significantly associated with either qualitative or quantitative (∆bw%) birth weight discordance at genome-wide level pre-defined as false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05.
Data were also corroborated by quantitative real time RT-PCR, showing discordance for only one transcript, i.e. ZFP36L1.
DNA methylation data was analysed by a linear mixed effects model [ 13] that contained fixed effects for qualitative (larger or smaller) as well as quantitative or degree of birth weight discordance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com