Quantitative averaged data from 20, 34, and 29 experiments for control, CALHM1, and P86L‐CALHM1 cells, respectively, show a 4.86‐fold increase over baseline [Ca2+]n in CALHM1 cells and 3.98‐fold increase for P86L‐CALHM1 cells, with respect to the control cells (Fig. 1B).
Recoveries were evaluated in different cosmetic matrices and they can be considered quantitative with average values between 70 and 120% with relative standard deviations (RSD) lower than 15%.
As with the whole body FOV, each subset setting gave similar quantitative results, average RCs were 1.02, 1.01, 0.98, and 0.95 for the 21, 17, 13, and 9 subset reconstructions.
For the quantitative features, average and dispersion measures were used, that is, the arithmetic mean and standard deviation.
Quantitative annual average daily exposures to straight metalworking fluids were transformed into a series of binary variables, each indicating whether the exposure level exceeded a different cutoff value.
This becomes evident in some of the MegaBLAST scores-based MWs as opposed to the % alignments MWs, as the former are based on a relative quantitative measure, average score, whereas the latter are based on a qualitative, presence or absence, measure.
Two senior orthopaedic surgeons (JFW and WJW) performed the measurements independently, with the interobserver quantitative data averaged for statistical analysis.
Frequently, only weakly quantitative distribution averages and standard deviations or intensity ratios are used to qualitatively discern differences among samples, instead of using appropriate multidimensional statistical tests with paired controls.
