Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Implant migration was quantified as the difference between the 12-month and the immediate postoperative measurements.
The initial decrease in [Ca2+]i was quantified as the difference between the resting [Ca2+]i and the minimal [Ca2+]i reached within 120 s after glucose perfusion.
Recruitability was quantified as the difference between the volume of non-inflated tissue at zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and at PEEP 15 divided by the volume of non-inflated tissue at ZEEP [11].
Responses were quantified as the difference between peak F340/380 less the average baseline for 10 s prior to stimulus application, as previously described [57].
To compare their binding preference, we used a receptor binding preference index, which was quantified as the difference between the binding strengths for the human receptor and that for the avian receptor ( <img src="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=info?doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0018664.e023.PNG" class= inline-graphic"/> ).
E S discrepancy, referred to as the " D-score" [Goldenfeld, Baron-Cohen, & Wheelwright, 2005; Lai et al., 2012b ] was quantified as the difference between standardized EQ and SQ-R scores.
Similar(50)
Program benefits were then quantified as the difference in savings between control and intervention groups.
The preference for one health state compared with another can be quantified as the difference in elicited utility values between the two health states, for example, different weight effects or different treatment regimens.
The velocity response was quantified as the difference in horizontal velocity of the C7 marker between 0.2 and 1.0 s after stimulus onset/offset.
The displacement response was quantified as the difference in horizontal position of the C7 marker between 0.2 and 2.0 s after stimulus onset/offset.
Hence, the deviation between the 'new' and 'old' groups in each genome is quantified as the difference of the 'new' and 'old' vectors (see Methods).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com