Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Fig. 6 Quantification of siderophore in Staphylococcus aureus culture supernatants.
Similar(59)
For quantification of the siderophore coprogen, the complete 50 ml culture supernatants were filtered and lyophilised to dryness.
The siderophore quantification of S. aureus-culture-supernatants is based on Chrome Azurol Sulphonate (CAS assay) according to Schwyn and Neilands (1987).
The orange halo formation is a reflection of siderophore release into the medium as a consequence of the siderophore action.
As siderophores can be taken up by any cell with the cognate receptor, regardless of its own levels of siderophore production, they represent a public good: while individually metabolically costly to produce, siderophores confer a group-level benefit [22], [26].
This xenosiderophore scavenging will thus allow the acquisition of siderophore-bound iron without the energy cost of siderophore production [ 35].
This makes siderophore secretion open to invasion by non-producing 'cheats', who pay none of the costs of siderophore production [ 2, 3], but can still use siderophores produced by nearby cells.
A crucial feature of siderophore production is that it is a form of cooperation: siderophores potentially benefit all bacteria within the locality that are capable of taking up the siderophore, but are metabolically costly to the producer [ 8].
Pyoverdine knockout mutants WCS358-PVD− and WCS417-PVD− are completely abolished in siderophore activity in the universal siderophore assay on CAS agar medium (Fig. 5) [ 73– 75], indicating that both strains produce only one type of siderophore.
Inactivation of these pumps results in decreased efflux of the fully synthesized siderophore, but increased extrusion of siderophore precursor products [ 14, 15].
This makes siderophore production open to invasion by non-producing 'cheats', who pay none of the costs of siderophore production, but can still take up siderophores produced by nearby cells [ 8, 9, 17].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com