Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(31)
Figure 3 Quantification error obtained for the three calibration phantoms and the three test phantoms.
Quantification error, defined as the percent difference between experimental and true activities, was evaluated.
On the whole image, the image-based method leads to no quantification error by construction.
The mean activity quantification error was −1.05 [2.12]%% for activity concentrations higher than 20 kBq/ml.
The resulting PET data was compared to the CT-derived standard regarding the quantification error and its clinical impact.
In the uniform part of the NEMA and contrast phantoms, a quantification error below 10% was achieved.
Similar(29)
Figures 2b, 3b, and 4d show box plots summarizing quantification errors for different phantom scans.
As a result, quantification errors due to misregistration stayed also small in these regions.
Overall relative quantification errors were below 7% in various acquisition conditions.
The resulting quantification errors were about 20% for the largest sphere.
Figures 2 and 3 do not show a big difference between quantification errors of small objects and big objects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com