Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Several instruments exist to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews [5], but not all of them have been developed systematically or empirically validated and have achieved general acceptance.
First, several instruments exist to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews[ 41], but not all of them have been developed systematically or empirically validated and have achieved general acceptance[ 19].
Author contact can enhance the quality of systematic reviews.
Shea, B. et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs).
To evaluate the quality of systematic reviews (SRs) affecting clinical practice in endocrinology.
To compare the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) published in high- and low impact factor (IF) Core Clinical Journals.
This paper presents the results of a systematic analysis of the quality of systematic reviews of empirical CPOE research.
Study Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the scientific quality of systematic reviews published in 5 leading emergency medicine journals.
To compare the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews by authors from China and those from the United States (USA).
Although Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is widely accepted for analyzing quality, the ROBIS instrument has recently been developed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com