Sentence examples for quality of research reports from inspiring English sources
To evaluate the quality of research reports published in the chiropractic literature.
The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD), first published in 2003, were developed to improve the quality of research reports on diagnostic studies.
Many systematic reviews have emphasized the poor quality of research reports.
Peer review is assumed to improve the quality of research reports as tools for scientific communication, yet strong evidence that this outcome is obtained consistently has been elusive.
Future studies could consider the methodological quality of research reports published in individual classes of virtual patients, which has been already investigated for Interactive Patient Scenarios e.g. by Cook et al. [ 19].
Research reporting guidelines are specifically intended to standardise and improve the quality of research reporting rather than research conduct, although they might also improve conduct by informing research design.
Editorial peer review is widely regarded as the cornerstone of quality assurance in academic medical scholarship.[1], [2] Aside from its broader purpose of fomenting scientific discourse, peer review serves two instrumental functions: to improve quality of research reporting ("quality improvement") and to aid editors in deciding whether to accept submitted work ("filtering").
An increasing body of evidence indicates that the guidelines do improve the overall quality of research reporting [ 52].
Previous studies have described the poor quality of research reporting [ 17- 19] but, encouragingly, research has also shown that the development and use of formalized guidelines improves the quality of reporting [ 20].
These challenges specific to the quality of research reporting represent one of many reasons for developing, implementing and encouraging the use of reporting guidelines [ 48] to make published research more useful for knowledge syntheses and application [ 49, 50].
Editors have an important leadership role in the implementation of reporting guidelines and improving the quality of research reporting, yet many appear to have little or no knowledge of reporting guidelines.
