Quality of reports was assessed by the fulfilment of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial (CONSORT) items.
This randomized clinical trial conforms to the Consort Statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) [ 33], whose aim is to improve the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement.
Last week, the government revealed that the quality of reports written by Atos assessors had fallen to "unacceptably poor" levels.
Moher, D. et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses.
In a previous study, we assessed the quality of reports of RCTs in plastic surgery published from 1966 to 2003.
To develop a checklist of items measuring the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing nonpharmacological treatments (NPTs).
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: the QUORUM statement.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
