Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "quality of personnel" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the capabilities and qualifications of the people employed in a company or organization. For example, "The company is renowned for the high quality of personnel that they employ."
Exact(9)
"With the quality of personnel we are looking to recruit, we are going to create an honest, hard-working culture with ambition and a want to win".
With the accelerated progress of economic globalization and advances in technology, the employers and the taxpayers claimed much higher quality of personnel training.
The practice of inbreeding, when universities fill positions of assistant professors and professors preferentially with their own graduates presents an obstacle to the mobility and also contributes to stagnation in research since the quality of personnel becomes a secondary factor.
"The reality of today is that it was a bit of a mismatch in quality of personnel, but for effort and commitment I thought our boys tried hard and gave their all for the 80 minutes.
They also worried that working conditions undermined the quality of personnel available to progressive candidates.
He said over time the quality of personnel rapidly declined, and the mentality under the Obama administration shifted to where, "a meritorious thing to do was to fire a shot, circumstances be damned".
Similar(51)
The players have enthusiasm, but there are doubts about the depth, health and quality of the personnel.
The exceptional reputation of the SAS is built on the quality of its personnel and its "Who Dares Wins" philosophy.
On Thursday, An Lusheng, chief of the Shanghai Railway Bureau, faulted the quality of equipment, personnel and on-site controls.
"In the G-3 section the quality of the personnel was not what one would ask in a division, to be perfectly honest," he said.
It was the execution, the spirt, the basic quality of the personnel involved, the system of recruitment and preparation that put them on the pitch together in the first place.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com