Previous research on the emergence of socio-technical systems [29, 30], on the governance of large technical systems [31, 32], or on socio-technical infrastructure systems [28, 33, 34] analyzes the emergent qualities of entities wherein social and technical elements interrelate.
Flags are attributes that denote the quality of the entities.
Flags were attributes that denote the quality of the entities.
In Tai Dam, the 'quality' of entities (i.e., rice, the backs (of toads) and the sky) is construed in an 'attributive' clause as "Process/Attribute": 'ripe & yellow', 'be rough' and 'be cloudy.
As far as the quality of the entity recognizer is concerned, the authors of [26] measured the precision of their approach.
In an intensively competitive market, measuring the service quality of any entity becomes vital to self-benchmark and, eventually, to improve the service quality beyond the predefined standards by the regulatory authorities.
Anticipating that the classifier system will involve quality of the entity, we can also compare these two views to see which is better suited to describe this linguistic system.
The meaning of all the instances in these Quality sub-groups did not concern Reaction or overall impression of an entity as originally described in the Appraisal framework; rather it expresses the delicacy in the appreciation of the quality of an entity.
The second part represents the quality of the entity and is described in a qualitative or quantitative way.
If two (or more) entities are involved in the phenotype, frequently a relational quality (quality of related physical entities; Figure 3), i.e., one that inheres between multiple entities, is required.
