Sentence examples for quality of conduct from inspiring English sources

Based on the SEAs undertaken in recent years, many academic analyses on the quality of conduct and content have been published (Chaker 2006; Stoeglehner et al. 2009), but the authors also state that only a very limited amount of work on the effectiveness of SEAs with regard to its ability to influence policy decisions is available [88, 89].

The questions in tier I are all related to crucial aspects of the quality of the design, the quality of conduct, and the quality of the reporting of HOS.

A persistent dilemma for those appraising and interpreting any form of published research is the extent to which it is valid to equate quality of reporting with quality of conduct for that study.

One possible solution, to overcome the problems due to weaker or different study designs, as well as different levels of quality of implementation (such as high drop-out rates or known biases) of some community-based studies, would be to routinely stratify analyses by methodological rigor and/or quality of conduct of included studies.

The first tier of the framework consisted of six criteria that are related to crucial aspects of the quality of the design, the quality of conduct, and the quality of the reporting of human observational studies [see Supplemental Material (doi 10.1289/ehp.0901127)].

We also explore whether the focus on improving the general conduct and reporting of cluster-randomised trials and discussions of ethical issues in these trials in the early part of the 21st century was associated with a change in the quality of conduct and reporting of ethical processes in these trials.

This approach could potentially be used in situ to monitor the electrocatalyst/electrode interface quality of conducting polymer-supported electrocatalysts.

We analyzed the quality of conducting NI trials by comparing the design and analysis characteristics of the trials reported in the high-impact vs. low-impact journals; and between the trials that were sponsored by industry and non-industry.

Differences in the quality of conducting and reporting of basic and clinical research may explain this finding.

QUADAS is a checklist to help readers assess key issues about quality of conducting and reporting of diagnostic test research, which will help in results interpretation.

Several authorities and organizations have provided guidance to improve the quality of conducting SRs, 1– 3 such as the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the Institute of Medicine (IOM).