quality of

USAGE SUMMARY

"quality of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is commonly used to refer to the level of excellence in something. For example, "The quality of the food was outstanding."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

A variable quality of sport.

Independent

Better quality of job experience".

The New York Times - Magazine

What about quality of life?

The New York Times

Quality of life also mattered.

The New York Times

Quality of service is another.

The New York Times

Quality of goods is poor.

The New Yorker

Good quality of work.

The Guardian - Sport

Quality of the game?

The New York Times - Sports

"Quality of life issues.

The New York Times

Quality of work matters.

The Guardian - Money

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"Quality-of-life stuff.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the "quality of" something, be specific and provide concrete details to support your assessment. For instance, instead of saying "the quality of the service was good", specify "the quality of the service was excellent due to the staff's attentiveness and prompt response time".

Common error

Avoid using "quality of" in vague statements without providing context or supporting information. Saying "the quality of life is important" is less effective than explaining how specific factors contribute to or detract from it.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "quality of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun to specify its characteristics or attributes. Ludwig shows that it is commonly used to describe various aspects, from tangible items like "quality of goods" to abstract concepts like "quality of life".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Social Media

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "quality of" is a versatile and commonly used prepositional phrase that functions to describe or evaluate the attributes or characteristics of something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability across diverse contexts. To use it effectively, be specific and provide supporting details rather than making vague generalizations. While adaptable across different registers, it is most frequently found in news, scientific, and formal business contexts. When seeking alternatives, consider options like "level of", "standard of", or "caliber of" depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

level of excellence in

Focuses on the degree of superiority or merit.

degree of merit in

Highlights the extent to which something is praiseworthy.

excellence in

Emphasizes the superior aspect of something.

standard of performance in

Emphasizes the benchmark against which something is measured.

caliber of

Refers to the general character or degree of excellence.

grade of

Indicates a specific rank or level.

nature of

Indicates the intrinsic characteristics of something.

value of

Highlights the worth or importance.

attributes of

Highlights the specific characteristics or features.

properties of

Focuses on the inherent qualities or characteristics.

FAQs

How do I use "quality of" in a sentence?

The phrase "quality of" is used to describe the attributes or characteristics of something. For example, "The "quality of the air" in the city has improved significantly" or "The "quality of the product" is outstanding".

What are some alternatives to "quality of"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "level of", "standard of", "degree of", or "caliber of" instead of "quality of".

Is it correct to say "the quality of something is good"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. However, consider providing more specific details to enhance clarity, such as "the quality of the ingredients is excellent".

What's the difference between "quality of" and "standard of"?

"Quality of" generally refers to the characteristics or attributes of something, while "standard of" refers to a benchmark or level of performance. For example, "the "quality of the work"" describes its attributes, while "the "standard of the work"" refers to the level it achieves against a set criterion.