qualifications are

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "qualifications are" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the credentials, skills, or experiences that someone possesses, often in relation to a job or role. Example: "Her qualifications are impressive, making her a strong candidate for the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Qualifications are necessary sometimes.

The New York Times - Magazine

Some qualifications are important.

The Guardian

The qualifications are clear.

The Guardian - Sport

But her qualifications are superior".

The New York Times

My qualifications are second to none.

Independent

Again a few qualifications are in order.

Encyclopedia Britannica

No cash or special qualifications are required.

The New York Times

But several important qualifications are in order.

The Guardian

Other qualifications are up for debate, too.

The Guardian

Her qualifications are not top-notch.

The Guardian

"Your qualifications are remarkable," he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When listing qualifications, be specific and provide concrete examples. For instance, instead of saying "strong communication skills", specify "experience presenting to large audiences and writing clear, concise reports".

Common error

Avoid vague language when describing qualifications. Instead of stating that someone has "relevant experience", detail the specific projects or roles that demonstrate their expertise. Use quantifiable metrics whenever possible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "qualifications are" functions as a linking verb phrase, connecting a subject (such as a person or a role) with a description of their attributes, skills, or credentials. Ludwig AI confirms its standard grammatical structure and widespread use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Wiki

7%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "qualifications are" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression for describing the attributes, skills, or credentials that are necessary or desirable for a particular role or position. Ludwig AI validates its common usage across diverse contexts, from news and media to scientific and formal settings. When using this phrase, it's important to be specific and provide concrete examples to avoid vagueness. Alternatives such as "criteria include" or "requirements consist of" can be used to add variety and precision to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

criteria include

Focuses on the specific standards or benchmarks used for evaluation, rather than the attributes themselves.

requirements consist of

Emphasizes the mandatory conditions or prerequisites that must be met.

credentials involve

Highlights the documented evidence of a person's skills and accomplishments.

attributes encompass

Broadly covers the qualities and characteristics that define suitability.

skills comprise

Specifically refers to the abilities and expertise one possesses.

competencies entail

Focuses on the demonstrated capabilities to perform specific tasks or functions.

prerequisites encompass

Highlights the necessary prior conditions or requirements.

eligibility involves

Pertains to the state of meeting the necessary conditions to be considered for something.

standards dictate

Emphasizes the set benchmarks or levels of quality that are required.

specifications detail

Focuses on the precise and explicit requirements that must be met.

FAQs

How can I use "qualifications are" in a sentence?

You can use "qualifications are" to describe the attributes or skills needed for a specific role or to assess someone's suitability. For example, "The key "requirements are" a degree in engineering and five years of experience."

What are some alternatives to saying "qualifications are"?

Alternatives include "criteria include", "requirements consist of", or "credentials involve", depending on the specific context.

Is it more formal to say "qualifications are" or "skills include"?

"Qualifications are" is generally neutral in tone and suitable for various contexts. "Skills include" might be slightly more informal, but both are widely acceptable.

How do I ensure I'm accurately representing someone's qualifications?

Be specific and provide concrete examples. Verify the information with reliable sources and avoid making assumptions. Clearly articulate what the "attributes encompass" and how they relate to the desired outcome.