Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(59)
He stuck resolutely to the real world: the existing law (recent cases have been decided consistently in favor of the copyright holders and against the putative infringers), the cost of making movies, the risk to the producers of having their products copied and thrown up on the Internet, the importance of intellectual property to the economy, as America's greatest trade export.
Before spending a cent, ask the infringer to stop infringing your work.
Well, often the alleged infringer argues that the claimed infringement is actually a parody of the trademark-protected product.
That is the opposite of how a patent-infringement case is usually settled, with the generic infringer paying the brand-name patent holder.
As Standler (2012) argues, since "copyright infringement occurs without proof of intent by the infringer,… intent should also be irrelevant to determination of plagiarism" (p. 7).
Knowledge Contributory liability requires that the secondary infringer "know or have reason to know" of direct infringement.
In a standard patent infringement lawsuit, a settlement payment would be made by an infringer to the patent holder.
Italy is among the European countries that recognise the highest damages taking account of the infringer's profits.
The putative legislation declares war on homosexuality.
But his populism was always putative.
Many counternarratives revolve around her putative misbehavior.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com