put judgments into effect in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "put judgments into effect in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the implementation or enforcement of decisions or rulings in a specific context or area. Example: "The court's decision will put judgments into effect in the upcoming trial."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

This strategy was put into effect in 1808 09.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A similar "quick-pay" policy was put into effect in the EU in 2013.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

People are talking about plans being put into effect in September but that's no good.

The Guardian - Business

The 55-mile-an-hour speed limit was put into effect in 1974.

The New York Times

If it is approved, the treaty could be put into effect in January.

The New York Times

A study of bridge-building was put into effect in France, Holland and Germany.

The Guardian

Legislation permitting divorce was passed by the parliament in June and put into effect in October.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The protections were put into effect in 1979 after a 13-week walkout.

The New York Times

Hill managed to put his program into effect in 1840, despite bureaucratic hostility.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A modest pilot program was put into effect in September 2007.

Forbes

However, the relevant policies and specific measures need to be put into effect in this scenario.

Petroleum Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "put judgments into effect in", ensure the context clearly defines the 'judgments' and the specific area or system where they are being applied for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "put judgments into effect in" without clearly specifying what 'judgments' refers to. Unclear references can lead to confusion and weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "put judgments into effect in" is as a verbal phrase indicating the implementation or activation of decisions within a specified context. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "put judgments into effect in" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe the implementation of decisions or rulings within a specific area. While not frequently encountered, as highlighted by Ludwig, it maintains a neutral register suitable for professional contexts. Key to its effective use is ensuring clear references to the 'judgments' and the specific context of their application.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

implement decisions in

Focuses on the act of implementing, making it suitable when the process is more important than the judgement itself.

enforce rulings in

Highlights the authoritative nature of the rulings and their enforcement.

execute judgments in

Emphasizes the execution aspect, useful when the outcome is the key point.

apply rulings within

Highlights the scope or area in which the rulings are applied.

put decisions into practice in

Emphasizes the practical application of decisions.

operationalize decisions in

Focuses on making decisions operational, suitable for business or technical contexts.

effectuate judgments within

A more formal way to express bringing judgments into effect.

carry out judgments in

Implies a process of fulfilling or completing the judgments.

translate judgments into action in

Emphasizes the transformation of judgments into concrete actions.

actualize rulings within

Highlights the realization of the rulings in a specific context.

FAQs

How can I use "put judgments into effect in" in a sentence?

To use "put judgments into effect in", specify the decisions or rulings being implemented and the domain where they're applied. For example, "The court's decision will "implement decisions in" the upcoming trial".

What's a formal alternative to "put judgments into effect in"?

A more formal alternative is to say "effectuate judgments within". This is suited to professional or legal settings where precision is key.

Is "put judgments into effect in" the same as "enforce rulings in"?

While similar, "enforce rulings in" emphasizes the authoritative nature and compulsion behind the implementation, while "put judgments into effect in" is a more general term for implementing decisions.

When is it appropriate to use "translate judgments into action in" instead of "put judgments into effect in"?

Use "translate judgments into action in" when you want to emphasize the transformation of abstract judgments into concrete, practical steps or actions.