put in charge of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "put in charge of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when assigning responsibility or authority to someone for a specific task or group. Example: "She was put in charge of the marketing team to lead the new campaign."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Morgan was put in charge of Cienfuegos.

The New Yorker

He was put in charge of parts.

The Economist

In 1494 Poynings was put in charge of this program.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Meanwhile the Socialists were put in charge of privatisation.

The Economist

In 1978, Dunleavy was put in charge of the newsroom.

The New Yorker

In 1981, he was put in charge of that division.

The New York Times

Orry was first put in charge of Spain's military finance.

Encyclopedia Britannica

After that he was put in charge of foreign intelligence.

The New York Times

I was put in charge of the NHS racket.

The Guardian - Opinion

Felat was put in charge of eleven other women.

The New Yorker

Who better to put in charge of justice?

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "put in charge of", clearly define the scope of responsibility and the expected outcomes to ensure clarity and accountability.

Common error

Avoid using "put in charge of" without specifying the area or task for which the person is responsible. For example, instead of saying "He was put in charge", specify "He was put in charge of the project's finances."

Linguistic Context

The phrasal verb "put in charge of" functions as a predicate assigning responsibility or authority. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it correctly indicates the action of entrusting someone with a particular role or duty. It often connects a subject with a specific area of oversight, as exemplified in "He was put in charge of the newsroom."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Encyclopedias

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrasal verb "put in charge of" is a common and grammatically correct way to express the assignment of responsibility or authority, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It is widely used across diverse contexts, including news, encyclopedias, and scientific publications. The phrase's neutral register makes it suitable for both formal and informal communication. Related alternatives include "assigned responsibility for" and "made responsible for". When using "put in charge of", ensure that the specific area of responsibility is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

made responsible for

This focuses on the creation of responsibility.

assigned responsibility for

This alternative emphasizes the act of assigning responsibility, focusing on the duty given.

tasked with leading

This suggests a specific task and leadership role are being assigned.

given control over

This emphasizes the granting of control and authority.

given the authority to manage

This highlights the conferral of authority and the act of managing.

appointed to oversee

This emphasizes the act of appointing someone to a supervisory role.

designated as head of

This indicates a formal designation to a leadership position.

placed in command of

This suggests a military or hierarchical leadership role.

entrusted with the management of

This alternative conveys a sense of trust and delegation.

empowered to direct

This highlights the empowerment and directive role being granted.

FAQs

How do I use "put in charge of" in a sentence?

Use "put in charge of" to indicate that someone has been given responsibility for something. For example, "She was put in charge of the marketing campaign".

What can I say instead of "put in charge of"?

You can use alternatives like "assigned responsibility for", "made responsible for", or "appointed to oversee" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "put in charge of" or "placed in charge of"?

Both "put in charge of" and "placed in charge of" are grammatically correct and have similar meanings. The choice often depends on stylistic preference.

What's the difference between "put in charge of" and "responsible for"?

"Put in charge of" implies the act of assigning responsibility, while "responsible for" describes the state of having responsibility. For example, "He was put in charge of the department, making him responsible for its performance."