Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Put for each and.
Put for each In view of Lemma 1.2 and (R4), we obtain that is nonexpansive and.
Don't talk about the answers you put for each question with your friends.
Similar(57)
By putting for each, we have By (W4), we have.
(1) By putting for each, we have By (W4), we have.
Putting for each, from (2.3) and the monotonicity of, we have (3.4).
It follows that the multifunction (T:h(X to2^{Y}) defined by putting, for each (sin h(X)), T s)=h^{-1}(s cap Y is lower semicontinuous in (h(X)) with nonempty values.
For each (nin{mathbf{N}}), let (h_{n}:Ttimes Wto[0,+infty[ ) be defined by putting, for each ((t,x in Ttimes W), h_{n} t,x =-d_{S}bigl(s_{n},x =-d_{S}biglBy as_{n}tion (i) and Theorem 3.3 oF t9],x bigrunction (h_{n}) is ({mathcal{T}}_{mu}otimes{mathcal{B}}(W))-measurable.
} tin[a,b], u(a)=u(b)=0, end{cases} (5) where (F:[a,b]timesmathbf{R}timesmathbf{R}tomathbf{R}) is the (single-valued) function defined by putting, for each ((x,y inmathbf{R}^{2}), F t,x,y)= textstylebegin{cases} 0&mbox{if }xinmathbf{Q}mbox{ or }yinmathbf{Q}, 1&mbox{otherwise}.
Let Y be an ordered q-starshaped subset of X and f, g : Y → Y. Put, Set, for each x in X comparable with q in Y,.
Put for.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com