For Stevenson, language is an instrument or tool for serving certain purposes; ethical language is thus suited especially for the central purposes of ethics.
Since the central purposes of ethics are to resolve or coordinate attitudes, an analysis of ethical language must reveal how ethical language serves these dynamic purposes.
Ethical language should be suitable for the purposes of ethics.
Those papers are classified as "policy" and "decision" types, and it evidences that the Delphi has been used for these purposes in ethics.
Since, for Stevenson, the purposes of ethics are to settle, coordinate, or otherwise resolve disagreements in attitude, an analysis of ethical language must display how ethical language is apt for performing these functions.
However if it is used for research purposes then ethics approval must be sought.
The purpose, direction, ethics, and sustainability of science and innovation have to be defined by society as a whole – but that can only happen if more people feel able to take part in such debates.
Before the interview began the reason for undertaking the interview was explained to patients, and, for the purpose of ethics, patients were told that at any time the interview could be stopped and their data removed with no subsequent influence on or to their care.
According to some of the experts "Delphi benefits depend on what the research question is, for some things, Delphi is ideal", which opens the door to its use for business ethics purposes.
No consensus or feedback is required here because the aim is to record the participants' opinions on Delphi's use for business ethics research purposes.
