The definition included the threat of damage to property as well as a threat to life if it is designed to influence the government or intimidate the public for the purpose of advancing an ideological cause.
They are in this mess because the "doctors will decide" mantra was always a fig leaf for their true ideological purpose of driving competition and privatisation into the heart of the NHS..
Additionally the disclosure, or threat of the disclosure, is designed to influence a government, and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause.
"Additionally the disclosure, or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government, and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause.
Here is the government's exact words from a court filing they made in November 2013: Additionally the disclosure [of NSA/GCHQ documents], or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause.
Additionally, they wrote that "the disclosure or threat of disclosure is designed to influence a government, and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause".
Second, the use or threat of action is for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause.
Formerly defined as "violence for political ends", it now includes action, used or threatened, for the purpose of advancing any "political, religious or ideological" cause.
One MP took issue with me, pointing out that the 2000 Terrorism Act defined terrorism as violence "for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, or ideological cause".
CSIS' own legal mandate forbids it from monitoring "lawful advocacy, protest or dissent," unless it has reasonable grounds to suspect that those activities may constitute "serious violence against persons or property for the purpose of achieving a political, religious or ideological objective".
