Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
These domains are: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, and editorial independence.
There were congruent questions in each instrument in four domains (Scope & Purpose, Stakeholder involvement, Underlying evidence/Rigour, Clarity).
Quality is assessed on 23 items in six domains: scope and purpose; stakeholder involvement; rigour of development; clarity and presentation; applicability and editorial independence.
We complied with the following criteria: definition of the scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, application, and editorial independence.
12 13 AGREE II consists of 23 items grouped in six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability and editorial independence.
The instrument consists of 23 items organized into six domains: scope and purpose; stakeholder involvement; rigour of development; clarity of presentation; applicability; and editorial independence.
The final version of the instrument contained 23 items grouped into six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, and editorial independence.
Each of these guidelines was evaluated across six domains including: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, application, and editorial independence.
The iCAHE instrument included questions that addressed four of the AGREE II domains (Scope and Purpose, Stakeholder Involvement, Rigour of Development and Clarity of Presentation).
Domains 'scope and purpose'stakeholderder involvement' and 'clarity and presentation' received highest scores; the lowest score was seen for editorial independence median 4% (range 0-25).
It has 23 items in six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability and editorial independence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com