It would be illegal to disseminate this information, because it is, for all intents and purposes, classified.
We utilized hemoglobin values obtained for clinical purposes, classifying subjects into categories consisting of no anemia (hemoglobin >13 g/dL), at least borderline (≤ 13 g/dL), at least mild (≤ 12 g/dL), at least moderate (≤ 10 g/dL), and severe (≤ 8 g/dL) anemia.
The evaluating result range for CP used for this purpose was classified into 5 levels: excellent, better, general, bad and worst, as was the range for CC (very high, much high, common, much low and very low).
For this purpose, we classified all trials in the saccade conditions into one of the 3 time bins – −60 to −40 ms, −40 to −20 ms, and −20 to 0 ms – depending on time elapsed between the figure and saccade onsets, calculated means for each participant and each time bin, and then calculated mean values across all participants for each time bin.
Outlays for such purpose are classified as GB expenditure in the AoA.
For this purpose, we classified boys into "short" AGI (< 25% of expected for age) or "not short".
For this purpose, we classified patients according to the cut-off points of the MCID established for this type of procedure [ 44, 45].
For this purpose, we classified the particles according to their number of bonds, Nb, and calculated the corresponding probability distributions, P(α z ) and P(α xy ), for each type of bonded particles.
For this purpose, we classified the type of LTPA according to intensity: light (< 3 METs), moderate (3-6 METs) and vigorous (> 6 METs), and participants were grouped into three categories: no LTPA or LTPA intensity of < 3 METs, LTPA intensity of ≥ 3 METs but does not meet the recommendations, and, finally, LTPA intensity of ≥ 3 METs and does meet the recommendations.
