Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
The simulation study suggests that the huff time and puff time should be the same.
For the studied reservoir, an optimum huff or puff time is about 600 days.
Because of higher compressibility of a gas condensate fluid, either huff or puff time required will be longer than that for a shale oil reservoir.
GC MS results showed the amount of nicotine evolved decreased with increase in the puff time.
A reaction time of 2.0 s was employed in line with the average puff time in cigarette smoking.
For every puff time, the concentration of nicotine was determined using a GC MS hyphenated to a mass selective detector as discussed in the section above.
Similar(52)
puffing temperature (175 275°C), puffing time (15 75 s), initial moisture content (30 40%) and air velocity (2.4 4.8 m/s) on quality attributes such as expansion ratio, hardness, ascorbic acid loss and overall acceptability of the products were investigated.
The optimum product qualities in terms of expansion ratio (4.7 times), hardness (1120.83 g), ascorbic acid loss (17.53%, db) and overall acceptability (7.56) were obtained at puffing temperature of 235.46 °C, puffing time of 51.11 s, initial moisture content of 36.74% and air velocity of 3.99 m/s.
puffing temperature (185 255 °C) and puffing time (20 60 s) with constant initial moisture content of 36.74% and air velocity of 3.99 m/s for potato soy blend with varying soy flour content from 5%to25%5% were investigated using response surface methodology with central composite rotatable design (CCRD).
The optimum product in terms of maximum expansion ratio (3.69), minimum hardness (2754.3 g) and maximum overall acceptability (7.3) were obtained with 10.31% soy flour blend in potato flour at the process conditions of puffing temperature (230.06 °C) and puffing time (25.46 s).
Longer puff times may be beneficial to the smoking community based on the results obtained from this work.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com