Sentence examples for publishing process for from inspiring English sources

"Effective immediately," Winston said, "IEEE is returning to its normal publishing process for all authors".

Its app features a quicker publishing process for its six-second videos with no need to choose a cover frame.

The benefits of semantically rich information exchange standards have revolutionised the scholarly publishing process for crystallography, and establish a model relevant to many other physical science disciplines.

They often become insensitive, even bullying, involving themselves very directly in the making and publishing process for other companies in a way that does not exist in other media.

Those sceptical about homeopathy were critical of publishing processes for homeopathic research, arguing that only positive studies of homeopathy tend to be published, which they saw as a barrier to gaining 'balanced evidence'.

The EAC critiqued the literature search, evidence selection and quality assessment of the included studies completed by the sponsor, and consulted clinical experts, identified using NICE's published processes, for advice on relevant comparators and patient groups.

We use the services provided by cloud development tools in the publishing process, write interface processing program for specific application programs, and publish it with corresponding publishing mechanism.

Certainly, technology is doing amazing things to how we produce and purchase books: millions of titles available at 2am in the middle of a desert; true democratization of the publishing process; plummeting prices for new releases; I've argued before that this is a new golden era of books.

Possibly the most stressful part of the publishing process is waiting for a response about your manuscript.

Instead, truly addressing the "reproducibility crisis" requires establishing new checks and balances for the publishing process through 1) technical review of methodology by publishers, and 2) incentivizing direct replication of key experimental results.

As an alternative approach, here we propose a system of checks and balances for the publishing process that involves 1) technical review of methodology by publishers, and 2) incentivizing direct replication of key experimental results.