Sentence examples for published tests of from inspiring English sources

Frame masonry composite was analyzed using neural networks trained on the experimental database that contains results of 113 published tests of one-story one-bay masonry infilled frames.

Many published tests of negative and positive selection using sliding windows that we have examined appear to be invalid because they fail to correct for multiple testing.

In 1994, there were fourteen published tests of symmetry and sexual selection, and only eight found a correlation.

More plausibly, the truth value of tested hypotheses could differ (if indeed it does differ) because of two sub-factors: Scientists in softer sciences might chose their hypotheses based on a greater amount of personal observations, preliminary results, and pure and simple intuition that precede a "formal", published "test" of the hypothesis.

In studies assessing the validity of similar published tests for school-children, correlations between sentence reading scores and reading aloud performance on subtests of our Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtest [61] ranged from.76 to.81.

In studies assessing the validity of similar published tests for school children, correlations between sentence reading scores and reading aloud performance on subtests of our Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtest (Landerl et al. 1997) ranged from 0.76 to 0.81.

The recurring theme of published tests was the Tagora´s lack of clear advantages or of a competitive edge.

(2008) stated that one of the criteria they used for the validity of published tests was adhering to unified validity.

As it has been largely published, tests performed as a function of time have as a common characteristic high standard deviation values.

In 2017 alone, studies were published testing the effectiveness of nicotine gum in reversing low blood pressure in Parkinson's disease patients, relieving intestinal pain after colorectal surgery and improving the performance of 20-something male athletes.

Finally, in an attempt to increase the specificity of the previously published test tool for identification of herds with poor welfare [ 7], this was combined with the currently identified test set to identify herds with good welfare, increasing the possibility to more correctly distinguish between herds with truly, according to the field assessment, good or poor welfare.