Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(27)
Experimental results compare favorably against previously published solutions.
The numerical results agreed very well with some published solutions.
In fact, this method yielded frequency plans that outperform the best previously published solutions.
The method is applied to the ACC benchmark problem and shown to outperform previously published solutions.
Stress-intensity factors produced by the present method are in good agreement with other published solutions.
Wherever possible, the results are verified by comparison with existing published solutions.
Similar(33)
The proposed approaches are also easily adapted to cater for a recently studied variant namely the single-source capacitated multi-facility Weber problem where they outperform those recently published solution methods.
The PVE score of the SF-model((VI 1) is 0.81 and for SF-model((VI 2) is 0.82 while the published solution showed 0.725 scores of the squared coefficient of correlation (R(^{2})) for the same IVS.
While our initial motivation was in response to a recently published solution based on Chandrasekhar's H-function, the presentation to follow has taken on a more comprehensive tone.
In the same way, the RMSE score of the SF-model((VI 1) is 0.34 and for SF-model((VI 2) is 0.33 while the published solution showed 0.2230 (RMSE= 0.47) score of squared standard error of the regression (S(^{2})) for the same IVS.
When best-fitting the experimental RDCs to the published solution-state structure (PDB code: 2KTX), a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.85 was obtained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com