Sentence examples for publications means from inspiring English sources

The arrival of these authoritative publications means that Utzon's work can finally be properly studied by architects and students.

The lack of statistical modeling in these publications means they lack precise claims, such as how much difference in participation rates is caused by giving students reminders or offering credit.

The exclusion of non-English language publications means that the results of our review should only be considered relevant for those countries whose media was analysed by researchers who published in English, primarily Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States.

These facts, in conjunction with the more limited availability of actual data in most journal publications, means regulatory agencies can face significant challenges in confirming the quality, performance, or data integrity of results obtained solely from information available from a typical article in peer-reviewed journals.

Working for a string of small on-campus organizations and digital publications meant that it took a while before I saw the inside of a "traditional office".

The 493 applications referenced 737 publications (mean 1.49 per applicant, range 0 12).

As indicated above, there was a lack of clarity for what the research publications meant by 'patient neglect'.

The subsequent time period, 2000 to 2004, included 280 publications (mean number of authors per publication 3.8) and 642 unique authors with 0.44 publications per author.

24 25262728293031323334353637383940414243 38 39 40 41 42 43 We excluded the study by Yang et al 42 43 because discrepancies between publications meant that data interpretation was impossible.

Investigating the publication count in PubMed for disease-associated and non-disease-associated genes reveals that disease-associated genes generally have larger numbers of publications (mean 67 versus 16; Figure 6C), again indicating potential bias.

The average clinical relevance rating for NIHR HTA reports was 5.48, statistically higher than the 5.32 rating for non-NIHR HTA publications (mean difference=0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.29, p=0.01).