Sentence examples for publication standard from inspiring English sources

The final 3 articles in this series will deal with writing a research paper to publication standard, working successfully with the journal review process, and refining electronic literature searches.

These works themselves follow the current publication standard of single sentence spacing.

Over one hundred scholars in the ISIBM IJCBS Program Committee have dedicated themselves to this great academic event in evaluating and selecting papers based on high publication standard.

After careful examination of the results and multiple consultations, the reviewers and the Reviewing editor decided that the results did not reach the level of significance claimed by the authors and despite tackling an interesting problem, the main interpretations would require a lot more work to meet our publication standard.

After undergoing rigorous review process to meet the high publication standard of OSA, we selected 14 papers to be included in this special issue, covering such areas as optical coherence tomography and its variants [ 1– 8], photoacoustic microscopy [ 9, 10], laser Doppler/speckle imaging [ 11, 12], and near infrared spectroscopy and fluorescence imaging [ 13, 14].

Categorical variables were presented as frequencies, and the data on citations and publication standard items were presented as median and intequartile range (IQR 25%to75%5%), or mean and 95% CI, depending on the distribution of data, tested using D'Agostino-Pearson test.

Although a number of prominent scientists and lay people have made their genomes public, genetics research and scholarly publication standards call for protection of the identities of research subjects and their families.

Journalists and traditional news publishers are no longer the primary information 'gatekeepers' of public discourse; neither are they able to impose their professional publication standards and ethics on social media users and bloggers.

(Some of the most interesting work quoted here can be found on the Internet. But it has not met the publication standards of scholarly journals like Homo Oeconomicus).

There has not been agreement on analogous publication standards for educational intervention trials, making interpretation of educational intervention studies difficult.

They claim that their effort adds to the discussion of (a) the merits of business planning, (b) data replication and extension, (c) sample selection bias, (d) evaluation of normative research and (e) publication standards.