Sentence examples for publication score from inspiring English sources

Publication score: This score was calculated based on the distinct number of experiments in which the interaction was identified.

Weighting criteria for the publication score are based on the method developed by Tscharntke [ 18], whereby the first author is awarded the highest value, but the second and last authors also receive a higher score than the other coauthors.> For the remaining indicators, score assignment was straightforward, as shown in Table  1.

S p ≡ Publication   Score     | |     S p   ∈ [ 0 − 1 ] S p = log (b + 1 ) (n + 1 ) n ≡ Number of publications reporting the interaction | |   S p   ≡ n   ∈ N   [ 0, 1, 2, 3  ... ]. b ≡ Number of publications with maximum score; default: b = 7 The method score takes into account the diversity of interaction detection methods reported for an interaction.

Each of these sub-scores is also represented by a score between 0 and 1. S MI = K p × S p (n ) + K m × S m (c v ) + K t × S t (c v ) K p + K m + K t K [ p, m, t ] ≡ Weight   factor     | |     K ∈ [ 0 − 1 ] S [ p, m, t ] ≡ Scores     | |     S   ∈ [ 0 − 1 ]   The publication score takes into account the number of different publications supporting an interaction.

Another low-scoring publication (scoring 1/14) simply reported that there were no differences in global QOL at any time point, but did not report the time points assessed, analysis methods, or results for other questionnaire domains.

Moreover, it also illustrates how online publication scores over print.

Only one publication scored the maximum eight points.

To extract meaningful biological information from this list, we initially focused on the TF genes displaying the most markedly upregulated expression in colorectal adenomas together with the lowest publication scores.

52 53 The overall methodological quality of the studies of the studies was relatively good, with 26 publications scoring 5 or more of 9 on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

To obtain an overall quality assessment, publications scored 1 point for each criterion fully met, 0.5 for each partially met and 0 for each when no or very little information was reported.

The methodology presented is just a first attempt to compare scientific quality scores (publication and citation scores) with societal quality scores in a quantitative way.