Sentence examples for publication location from inspiring English sources

Three unblinded independent reviewers (Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Umberto Barbero, and Marta Bisi) abstracted the following data on prespecified forms: authors, journal, year of publication, location of the study group, and baseline clinical and interventional features.

As suggested by Arksey and O'Malley 9 we will extract general information about each study/article, such as the author, year of publication, location, purpose, main findings or conclusions, and recommendations, suggestions, or implications as stated by the article.

Each article classed as an IMPF was obtained in full and the following information extracted: year of publication, location of first author, disease/health condition of participants, outcomes of interest, and prognostic factors examined.

We also coded sample and study characteristics and included dimensions such as study identifier, year of publication, location/s of study (country and number of sites), and study duration.

To add a publication manually, a privileged user creates a new publication page using Drupal's content creation interface and adds details to describe the publication such as the title, year of publication, citation, abstract, publication location, pages, journal issue and volume and more.

Finish off with the publication location and the publisher.

The IUCN has guidelines prohibiting the publication of location data for endangered species of high economic value that are threatened by the pet trade, but many journals do not yet.

Our article rankings will also take into account a publication's location so we can promote all the local sources for each story.

It's still a mystery why Wal-Mart stores won't have the book visiibly available for customers, who do have the option of picking up the publication on location if they order it online.

The distorting effects of publication and location bias on systematic reviews and meta-analyses are well documented.

Our systematic review pertains to the potential incompleteness of the evidence reviewed, including publication and location bias, poor quality of the primary data and poor reporting of results.