Sentence examples for public manipulation from inspiring English sources
The phrase "public manipulation" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used in contexts discussing the influence or control of public opinion or behavior, often in relation to media, politics, or advertising.
Example: "The documentary explored the various techniques of public manipulation employed by political campaigns to sway voters."
Alternatives: "mass manipulation" or "public influence"
That they are not just instruments of public manipulation?
So began one of the most successful marketing and public manipulation campaigns of the 20th century, originating from four words: "A diamond is forever".
The Bush administration has made a practice of public manipulation and distortion of facts to further its political and ideological agenda.
Public manipulation at any cost to her party and to her country, and, sisters, yes, to her sex -- as long as it gives her a leg up to win the presidency.
Unlike past dabblings in public affairs propaganda (yes, this all falls along the spectrum of public manipulation), new designs will enjoy an easing of the draconian Smith-Mundt Act, which required good manners in bad-mannered theaters, and greater empowerment of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, which oversees sprawling outlets like Voice of America.
The public manipulation changed aggregate point allocations (Figure 2).
Once made available for public use, photo manipulation came to be used quite widely by artists large and small.
Philip has made it clear that he, personally, has wearied of the fractious fray of private family in-fighting and public image manipulation.
Our public commitment manipulation did not affect all the dependent measures in our study—attitude, quality of conservation and habitat diversity did not change.
Participating farmers were divided in three groups: one group received tailored information only, one group received both tailored information and a public commitment manipulation, and one group served as a control.
We divided participants into three groups: one group received tailored information only, one group received tailored information plus a public commitment manipulation, and one group served as a control.
