Similar(60)
Participants included in the analyses were 16 individuals (7 women) with DSM-IV bipolar disorder (BD) and 16 age-matched non-psychiatric healthy controls (9 women).
It was hypothesized that sway area would be significantly larger in BD in comparison to a non-psychiatric healthy control group.
Sixteen participants with bipolar disorder (BD) and 16 age-matched non-psychiatric healthy controls were asked to stand as still as possible on a force platform for 2 minutes under 4 conditions: (1) eyes open-open base; (2) eyes closed-open base; (3) eyes open-closed base; and (4) eyes closed-closed base.
Healthy controls will be 19 35 years of age; with no lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric disorder; healthy; and taking no prescribed medications.
A total of N=121 biological mother/daughter dyads that differed in maternal depression diagnostic status were recruited for the present study: (1) currently depressed mothers (current depression, n=29); (2) formerly depressed mothers (past depression, n=39); and (3) mothers free from any psychiatric history (healthy controls, n=53).
A general health questionnaire was used to screen out psychiatric morbidity in healthy participants.
This study concentrated on the development and validation of the scale in a psychiatric and a healthy control sample.
All volunteers were asked to complete the TEMPS-A Scale, a self-report questionnaire designed to measure temperamental variations in psychiatric patients and healthy volunteers.
A recent review [1] questioned the existence of psychological difficulties in migraine children, concluding that they don't exhibit neither more psychological dysfunctions nor more psychiatric comorbidity then healthy controls.
Objective: To validate a short English-language version of the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-autoquestionnaire version (TEMPS-A), a self-report questionnaire designed to measure temperamental versionons in psychiatric patients and healthy volunteers.
However, the within-study replication in psychiatric patients and healthy volunteers justifies a fairly high level of confidence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com