But I do know that Better Together refused to provide panellists for last night's debate, their argument being that there's no point in them preaching to the converted.
The anonymity of the panellists throughout the process allowed all views to be considered, and provided panellists the opportunity to change their opinions based on the merit of the arguments presented.
The panellists develop their overall perception while providing other panellists tools for developing theirs.
The two-round process was focussed on detecting consensus among the panellists (providing the same grade), and no attempt was made to force the panellists to consensus.
Water was provided, and where panellists were required to taste the samples, they were asked to expectorate and rinse their mouths after each sample.
Panellists provided 348 comments to the Round 1 question.
Some panellists felt that providing resources was essential to encourage home practice; while others re-emphasised the potential safety risks of unsupervised self-practice in clinical populations.
In the fourth Delphi-round, panellist provided feedback to the remaining set of QIs.
The panellists discuss the challenges of providing care and support to pregnant women and mothers in conflict, post-conflict and emergency situations, as well as what may be done to address these challenges.
