Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Other secondary outcomes are: costs quality of life (measured using the EQ5D measure [ 31] the individual scales and the mental component summary measure from the SF-36 waiting times for treatment time lost from work and usual activities satisfaction with care provided preference for telephone or face-to-face assessment.
Similar(59)
Areas covered were: demography, medical/treatment history, co-morbidities and medication, symptoms prior to diagnosis that prompted medical help seeking, most 'bothersome' treatment side effects and care received to ameliorate them, other support and help provided, preferences for future treatment/care and patients' views on maintenance therapy using a hypothetical scenario.
Such relationship may provide preference for risk of breast cancer in different population.
Although breast cancer risk prediction remains imperfect, this might provide preference for risk of breast cancer in different population.
GPBMs are scored using a utility scale (that is the quality weight of the QALY) which is derived by asking the general population to provide preferences for health states defined by the descriptive system of the measure.
Then, 320 individuals provided preference ratings for a randomized subset of the panoramic photographs (15 pictures per person).
People with musculoskeletal disorders (n = 221 of 296 eligible) accessing one of three clinics provided preference ratings for "how much" they wanted to receive physical activity support via five potential communication modalities.
In three of these studies, parents had stood as proxies to provide preference values for their own children.
Section "Preference bounds for FLDM and SLDM" briefly discusses the necessity for providing preference upper and lower bounds for both level DMs.
The user provides their preference for all k criteria cr as weights {w j,j = 1,2,...k} that are normalized to 1.
The results obtained and the optimization algorithm presented in this study can provide a preference for the optimization design of SAHPHS.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com