provided into

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "provided into" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It is typically incorrect because "provided" is usually followed by "to" or "for," not "into." Example: "The resources will be provided to the participants at the start of the workshop."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Britain has provided £10m.

Independent

The Lottery provided £3.7m.

The Guardian

M.K. provided Tal1 cells.

Nature

provided Csf1fl/fl mice.

Nature

The Foundation provided £2.5m in 2012-13.

The Guardian

The company provided 22 pounds of sauerkraut.

The New York Times

T.J. provided Ffar3−/− and Ffar2−/− mice.

Nature

B.Cha. provided Gnat1rd17Gnat2cpfl3 double mutant mice.

Nature

Pierce ended with 23 points and Allen provided 16 points.

The New York Times

During 2012-13 King Power provided £80m further loans.

The Guardian - Sport

Another provided 325 units of affordable housing.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "provided into". Instead, use "provided to" or other similar alternatives that are grammatically correct.

Common error

The common mistake is using "into" after "provided". Always use "to" to indicate the recipient or destination of what is being provided.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "provided into" functions incorrectly as a prepositional phrase. Grammatically, it fails to establish a clear and logical relationship between the action of providing and the object it should connect to. This assessment aligns with Ludwig AI's indication of its incorrect usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "provided into" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. As Ludwig AI confirms, the correct usage involves using the preposition "to" instead of "into" (e.g., "provided to"). Given its lack of support from authoritative sources and its grammatical flaws, using alternative phrases such as "supplied to" or "delivered to" is highly recommended to ensure clarity and correctness in writing. The assessment underscores the importance of precise language use and adherence to established grammatical norms across various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

provided to

Changes the preposition to "to", indicating the recipient or destination of what is being provided.

supplied to

Replaces "provided" with "supplied", offering a similar meaning while maintaining grammatical correctness with the preposition "to".

delivered to

Substitutes "provided" with "delivered", emphasizing the act of transporting or handing over something to a specific location or person.

furnished to

Replaces "provided" with "furnished", suggesting the act of equipping or supplying something necessary or useful.

offered to

Substitutes "provided" with "offered", highlighting the act of presenting something for acceptance or rejection.

given to

Replaces "provided" with "given", indicating the act of handing over something as a gift or contribution.

allocated to

Substitutes "provided" with "allocated", implying the assignment or distribution of resources for a specific purpose.

distributed to

Replaces "provided" with "distributed", focusing on the act of spreading something among a group or area.

made available to

Rephrases "provided" with a more descriptive phrase, emphasizing the act of making something accessible or usable.

equipped with

Shifts the focus from providing to equipping, suggesting the addition of necessary components or features.

FAQs

What is the correct preposition to use after "provided"?

The correct preposition to use after "provided" is "to", as in "provided to". The phrase "provided into" is grammatically incorrect.

Are there alternatives to using the word "provided"?

Yes, you can use alternatives such as "supplied to", "delivered to", or "furnished to" depending on the context.

How can I use "provided to" in a sentence?

You can use "provided to" in a sentence like this: "The necessary resources were provided to the participants."

Why is "provided into" considered incorrect?

The phrase "provided into" is incorrect because the preposition "into" does not logically follow the verb "provided". "To" indicates direction or recipient, which is the correct relationship.