Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
AW, XL and DC provided discussions on clinical relevance.
JS and JW provided discussions on clinical relevance.
AW, XL, LLM, AK and DC provided discussions on clinical relevance.
Similar(57)
VAK coordinated research, provided discussion, and performed manuscript preparation.
JF, JP and LM supervised the work, provided discussion and revised the manuscript.
Henrik Brumm and Matthais Ritchard provided discussion on call intensities and body size.
JJ, RM, and CA provided discussion based on sickness absence.
GS provided discussion on pathophysiology and helped outline the manuscript.
All co-authors provided discussion, data interpretation and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
This special volume relevance provides discussions and contributions to foster that desirable future.
Section 6 provides discussions and a theoretical comparison with other mechanisms that fall in the same category as our scheme.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com