provide to everyone

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "provide to everyone" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used when you want to express the act of giving something to all individuals in a group. Example: "We aim to provide to everyone the resources they need for success."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

"The population is too diverse to have a common vision of what it wants to provide to everyone.

The New York Times

Brazil, Guyana, Indonesia, Liberia and Peru have agreements with Norway (and in the case of Peru the agreement also includes Germany) under which the rich countries are paying for some of the carbon capture climate service that the tropical forests provide to everyone in the world.

The Guardian

The fee covers the cost of services the labor union is required by federal law to provide to everyone in an organized workplace.

Huffington Post

We will also provide to everyone interested a tool that shows, in great detail, the products and their underlying structural information.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

It clarifies that pediatric services, one of the 10 required categories, must be provided to everyone 18 and under.

The New York Times - Health

While access to necessary and lifesaving medical care should be provided to everyone in federal custody, excessive privileges and questionable services should not be included.

The New York Times

We value it for the security it provides to everyone in our country, and we will always give it the resources it needs.

The Guardian - Opinion

We in the Conservative party are in no doubt about our approach: the NHS is something precious, we value it for the security it provides to everyone in our country, and we will always give it the resources it needs".

The Guardian

Such differences are not in line with the Swedish health-care act, which states that health-care should be provided to everyone, on equal terms [29].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

And, of course, this is what Google provides to everyone else that is making a game for Android!

TechCrunch

Subsequently, when working collaboratively in small groups, Open Educational Resources (OER) and other web-based applications are chosen by the learners in accordance with two specific principles: (a) resources used must be shareable, and (b) the URL for the site(s) must be provided to everyone in the learning community.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and correctness, replace "provide to everyone" with alternatives like "offer to all" or "supply to all". These options are more grammatically sound and widely accepted.

Common error

Avoid using "provide to everyone" in formal contexts. This phrasing can sound awkward and is not considered standard English. Instead, opt for more conventional alternatives such as "provide for everyone" or "offer to all" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "provide to everyone" functions as a verb phrase, attempting to express the action of supplying or offering something to all individuals. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect in standard written English. Examples show it used in various contexts, but more suitable alternatives exist.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

40%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "provide to everyone" is understandable, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect and should be used with caution. Ludwig AI indicates that standard English prefers alternatives like "provide for everyone" or "offer to all". The phrase appears across various contexts, including news, science, and general web content, but its infrequent usage and grammatical concerns make it less suitable for formal writing. When aiming for clarity and professionalism, opting for the suggested alternatives will enhance the quality and correctness of your writing. Be mindful of the context and choose the phrase that best conveys your intended meaning while adhering to standard grammatical conventions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

offer to everyone

Replaces "provide" with "offer", suggesting a choice rather than a direct supply.

supply to all

Uses "supply" and "all" to convey a more comprehensive distribution.

give to everyone

Employs "give", offering a simpler and more direct way to express the action.

make available to all

Uses a more formal structure with "make available" to indicate accessibility.

extend to everyone

Suggests broadening access or coverage to include all individuals.

grant to everyone

Implies a formal or official allocation of something.

furnish to everyone

A more formal and less common synonym for "provide".

allot to everyone

Indicates distributing something in portions to each person.

allocate to all

Similar to "allot", but often used in the context of resources or funds.

disseminate to everyone

Implies spreading information or knowledge widely.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "provide to everyone"?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "provide to everyone" is not considered correct in standard written English. It is better to use alternatives such as "provide for everyone" or "offer to all".

What are some alternatives to "provide to everyone"?

You can use alternatives such as "offer to everyone", "supply to everyone", or "make available to all". The best choice depends on the specific context.

How can I use "provide to everyone" correctly in a sentence?

While not grammatically ideal, if you intend to use "provide to everyone", ensure the context is informal. However, it's generally preferable to rephrase using options like "provide for everyone" or "give to everyone".

What's the difference between "provide to everyone" and "provide for everyone"?

"Provide for everyone" is the grammatically correct and more widely accepted phrase. It means to supply what is necessary or beneficial to all. "Provide to everyone", while understandable, is not standard English and should be avoided in formal writing.