Exact(3)
The Frog problem asked students to formulate a claim based on the given evidence and to provide appropriate reasoning (warrant) to support the claim.
Students in our course often worked on problems presenting biological data (evidence) and were asked to articulate conclusions (claims) based on such evidence, and to provide appropriate reasoning (warrants) in support of their claims.
We also developed simple rubrics for coding the claims and warrants students generated as part of these problems: The Frog problem asked students to formulate a claim based on the given evidence and to provide appropriate reasoning (warrant) to support the claim.
Similar(57)
Analysis of the warrants (Table 5) revealed that 27% of students provided appropriate reasoning to support their claim, by citing one or more elements of the experimental design.
Provides appropriate documentation for transactions.
Patients are provided appropriate privacy.
These abilities let student use appropriate reasoning and comprehensive thinking in different complex situations.
Provide appropriate feedback.
Provide appropriate detail.
Provide appropriate notice.
Provide appropriate shelter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com