Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The phrasing is disingenuous as the word "proven" implies there is proof she didn't do it.
Moreover, the non-negativity of I ( t ), E ( t ) and S ( t ) ∀ t ∈ [ 0, t f ] as it has been previously proven, implies that I ( t 0 ) ≤ N, E ( t 0 ) ≤ N and S ( t 0 ) ≤ N. Also, I ( t 0 ) ≥ δ > 0 since t 0 < t f and from the definition of t f in (3.16).
Similar(58)
Next we prove that implies.
Secondly, we prove that implies.
First, we prove (i) implies (ii)(a).
Goel [6] proved that implies that where.
First, we prove (i) implies (ii).
We will prove that implies that (2.29).
In the following, we prove (ii) implies (i).
Thus (23) is proved, which implies (20) by the Borel Cantelli lemma.
H2 well-posedness and stability are proved, which implies that the solution is at least continuous on the disk.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com