Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
He emphasizes that one should not confuse incompletely proven assertions with rigorously derived theorems of probability theory.
Similar(59)
Evidence offered to prove assertions that are neither at issue nor probative of the matter at issue would also be irrelevant.
Next we prove assertions (1) and (2).
To prove assertions (3) and (4) we actually repeat the proof of the assertion (2) of Theorem 5.2 (in the case H ∗ = 0 ).
Hence it follows that A is self-adjoint and that the resolvent of A at the point z has the asserted form, proving assertion (iii).
Finally, we prove assertion (3.3).
Next, we prove assertion (1).
We only prove assertion (ii).
We first prove assertion (I).
We only prove assertion (2).
Next we prove assertion ((A_{2})).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com