Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
It seems like the "believe me dude, it's scientifically proven!" argument is assertively dropped at every debate we have these days.
"But there is no scientific proven argument against women winning.
Similar(58)
This objection goes further than the less substantial "evolution isn't proven" arguments, claiming that evolution isn't even well-evidenced.
Hence, there is an asymmetry between proving arguments valid and proving them invalid: they are valid if they can be shown to be an instance of a valid form, but they are not proved invalid by showing that they are an instance of an invalid form, because both valid and invalid arguments instantiate invalid forms.
But the Golden State has proven that argument wrong before.
While the case is not proven, this line of argument will prove difficult, and ultimately, fall prey of the scientific experts.
Today, Barack Obama proved that argument quite wrong.
To prove his argument says he respects any woman.
There are ways of rationally accepting a claim that you can't prove by argument.
Statistics are supposed to have a plastic quality that allows them to be bent to prove any argument.
She took the student's violin and played -- no, played down -- the passage, proving her argument in sound.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com