Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
What's your reaction to the argument that drugs should not have to be proven effective before getting approved by the FDA? There's a history to proving effectiveness of drugs that goes back to pre-1962, that I think many people are aware of, and the requirements are written into law.
President Donald Trump has announced his intention to deregulate the health-care sector, and there are reports that he is considering as his F.D.A. chief the libertarian Jim O'Neill, who has stated he does not believe that drugs even need to be proven effective before going to market.
Licorice has proved effective in several studies.
This model proved effective with Micron Technology.
Still, another failure could strengthen the hand of critics in the Congress who have accused Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld of trying to rush a system into operation before it has proved effective.
Alden Abbott, deputy director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, said drug companies should be allowed to do limited marketing of drugs that have been shown to be safe in early-stage trials — and even before they have proved effective.
The terrorism proved effective.
Both proved effective.
This and the cost cuts proved effective.
The Moskowitz-inspired attack proved effective.
Her tightly managed system proved effective.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com