prove with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'prove with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are trying to explain the evidence used to support a statement or opinion. For example: He argued that the new regulation would cause difficulties, but he failed to prove with any concrete evidence.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

So what are the creators trying to prove with Tube crush?

Independent

We were trying to prove some things that we wanted to prove with the testing".

The New York Times

And they are exceptional songwriters, as they prove with this unusual set.

The Guardian - Music

More than enough, she says and goes on to prove with flair, to sustain a second hour at the Fringe.

Independent

His challenge moving forward will be to prove with his deeds that his words Tuesday night carried no deeper meaning.

The New York Times - Sports

"G.M. has a lot to prove with the Sonic," said Joseph Phillippi of the research firm Auto Trends.

The New York Times

He is seeking to prove, with numbers, that voters made a mistake when they trusted the coalition back in 2010.

The Economist

The promising new research about the colon cancer prevention properties of aspirin will take years to prove with certainty.

The New York Times - Science

I figured I had nothing to prove with the math because everyone knows I can't add fractions.

The New York Times - Magazine

So it ought to prove with the release of the tax details of these 1,500 companies.

The Guardian - Opinion

" 'She goes in with blinders on, poor thing.' " You get the sense that Ms. Bullock feels as if she has something to prove with "Gravity".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "prove with", ensure the 'with' clause specifies a tangible form of evidence or method. For example, "prove with data" or "prove with examples" strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "prove with" without clearly specifying the evidence or method. Saying "prove with research" is less impactful than "prove with research published in peer-reviewed journals".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prove with" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating the method or evidence used to demonstrate the truth or validity of a statement. As shown in Ludwig, it connects the act of proving to the means by which it's accomplished.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "prove with" is a versatile phrase used to emphasize the evidentiary foundation of a statement. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically sound and frequently employed across diverse contexts, including news, science, and business. To ensure effective communication, it's crucial to specify the type of evidence or method being referenced. Alternatives like "demonstrate using" or "establish with evidence" can provide nuanced variations, but the core intent remains focused on linking assertions to supporting proof.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

establish with evidence

Stresses the use of factual information to firmly assert something.

demonstrate using

Focuses on the act of showing something clearly through specific means.

support using

Focuses on providing backing or justification by making use of certain means.

substantiate by means of

Implies providing support or verification through particular methods or resources.

verify through

Emphasizes the process of confirming the truth or accuracy via a specific channel or method.

confirm through

Indicates affirming the truth or validity through a certain process or channel.

justify by

Indicates defending or showing the reasonableness of something through a particular method or rationale.

validate utilizing

Highlights the act of confirming the legitimacy or correctness by making use of certain tools or techniques.

corroborate employing

Suggests strengthening or supporting a statement with the help of particular tools or methods.

authenticate via

Centers on proving genuineness or validity through a specified route or method.

FAQs

How can I use "prove with" in a sentence?

Use "prove with" when you want to indicate the evidence or method used to support a claim. For example, "The scientist aimed to prove with empirical data that the new drug was effective."

What's a good alternative to "prove with"?

Alternatives include "demonstrate using", "substantiate by means of", or "establish with evidence", each emphasizing slightly different aspects of providing support for a claim.

Is it always necessary to explicitly state what I'm proving something with?

While not always grammatically required, explicitly stating the evidence or method (e.g., "prove with statistics") enhances clarity and strengthens your argument.

What is the difference between "prove with certainty" and simply "prove"?

"Prove" generally means to demonstrate the truth or validity of something. Adding "with certainty" emphasizes a higher degree of conclusiveness in the evidence or demonstration.