Exact(2)
Next, we prove conclusions (i) and (ii) hold for (M_{Omega,alpha}).
Noting that statements (i) and (ii) hold followed by (iii)–(v), we will only prove conclusions (iii)–(v).
Similar(58)
Now we prove conclusion (I).
Next, we prove conclusion (2).
We prove conclusion (i) first.
Next, we prove conclusion (II).
Here, we prove conclusion (b).
To prove conclusion (i), we suppose that (langle x_{1}rangle^>0).
Then Eq. (4.1) has a unique positive solution x ∗ ( t ) satisfying 10 − 2 ≤ x ∗ ( t ) ≤ 1. Proof We use Theorem 3.3 to prove Conclusion 4.1.
Note that Lemma 3.7 proves conclusion (2) of Theorem 3.5.
A few experimental data prove these conclusions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com