prove a violation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prove a violation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, regulatory, or compliance contexts when discussing the act of demonstrating that a breach of rules or laws has occurred. Example: "The auditor was tasked with proving a violation of the company's safety protocols during the inspection."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

But Mr. Meister noted that his agency did not need to show "intent to prove a violation of our law".

The New York Times

The findings of that investigation could prove a violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, according to a person briefed on the inquiry.

The New York Times

Supreme Court precedents since the 1970s have required evidence of intentional discrimination in order to prove a violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection guarantee.

The New York Times

The agency only has to prove a violation of the rule based on reckless conduct, a lower standard than proving a person acted intentionally.

The New York Times

The appeals court found insufficient evidence that the defendants knew about any benefit provided to the tippers, a requirement to prove a violation.

The New York Times

So any resolution short of that point will have to come from a settlement rather than a judicial decision about whether the evidence is sufficient to prove a violation.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

The insider trading prohibition, however, would be ill suited as a means to police how these firms operate because of the many hurdles to proving a violation.

The New York Times

The problem is not so much the penalty that can be imposed but proving a violation so the punishment can be meted out, according to White Collar Watch.

The New York Times

But on Thursday, the State Supreme Court vacated that order, saying that there was "insufficient evidence of fraud" and that the trustees had not proved a violation of policy.

The New York Times

There is not a statutory definition establishing its parameters, so it can be applied to a wide variety of transactions, and the crime does not have complicated requirements for proving a violation.

The New York Times

In Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo, the Supreme Court held that in private securities fraud cases, one element of proving a violation is "loss causation," which requires showing "a causal connection between the material misrepresentation and the loss".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "prove a violation" in legal documents, ensure you define the specific rule or law that has been violated to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "prove a violation" without specifying what constitutes the violation. Always provide context regarding the specific rules, regulations, or laws breached to make the statement meaningful and actionable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prove a violation" functions as a verb phrase with a noun phrase object. The verb "prove" takes the violation as its direct object, indicating the act of demonstrating or establishing that a violation has occurred. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Science

6%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "prove a violation" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase, as supported by Ludwig AI, that describes the act of demonstrating that a breach of rules or laws has occurred. It is most frequently encountered in news and media, with a neutral to professional tone depending on the context. While the phrase is generally well-understood, it's essential to specify the rule or law being violated to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases such as "demonstrate an infringement" or "establish a breach" can be used to add nuance or formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

establish a contravention

Replaces "violation" with "contravention" and "prove" with "establish", altering the tone slightly.

demonstrate an infringement

Uses "demonstrate" instead of "prove" and "infringement" in place of "violation", providing a formal alternative.

substantiate a breach

Employs "substantiate" to mean "prove" and "breach" as a synonym for "violation", adding a layer of formality.

verify non-compliance

Focuses on confirming "non-compliance" rather than directly proving a "violation", changing the perspective.

validate a transgression

Substitutes "prove" with "validate" and "violation" with "transgression", indicating a more severe breach.

confirm an infraction

Uses "confirm" as a less assertive alternative to "prove", while "infraction" is a milder term for "violation".

ascertain a default

Replaces "prove" with "ascertain" and "violation" with "default", often used in financial or contractual contexts.

affirm nonobservance

Emphasizes the confirmation of "nonobservance" rather than the act of proving a "violation".

determine culpability

Shifts the focus to determining "culpability" rather than proving a specific "violation", broadening the scope.

evidence misconduct

Uses "evidence" as a verb to suggest demonstrating "misconduct", changing the grammatical structure.

FAQs

What does it mean to "prove a violation" in a legal context?

In a legal context, to "prove a violation" means to present sufficient "evidence" to convince a judge or jury that a specific law, rule, or regulation has been breached.

What's the difference between "prove a violation" and "establish a breach"?

While similar, "prove a violation" often implies a formal, legalistic setting, whereas "establish a breach" can be used more broadly to indicate that a transgression has been confirmed, not necessarily in court.

What kind of "evidence" is needed to "prove a violation"?

The "evidence" needed to "prove a violation" depends on the specific context but can include documents, witness testimony, expert analysis, and other forms of data that support the claim that a violation occurred.

Are there alternatives to the phrase "prove a violation"?

Yes, alternatives include "demonstrate an infringement", "substantiate a breach", or "verify non-compliance", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.